Skip to content
ECONGALLERY ECONGALLERY

Distilling Economic Literature

  • econgallery
  • blog
  • about
ECONGALLERY
ECONGALLERY

Distilling Economic Literature

The Relative Tolerance of Holland

Dr. Ellen Clardy, May 6, 2022July 25, 2025

A Discussion of Bourgeois Equality Chapter 37 “For Instance, Holland Was Tolerant, and Not for Prudence Only”

In this chapter, Dr. McCloskey is wrapping up her discussion of the Dutch embrace of the bourgeois virtues by focusing on what impact it had on their relatively higher level of tolerance.

To get an understanding of what she means by saying they were relatively more tolerant, she offers this fact.

The Dutch stopped burning heretics and witches in the 1590s, early by European standards. The last burning of a Dutch witch was 1595, in Utrecht, an amusement which much of the rest of Europe — and Massachusetts, too — would not abandon for another century. Some forty thousand witches died in Europe, 1400 to 1800. (p. 345)

So keep that in mind while she discusses the high degree of tolerance of the Dutch that she is comparing them to the other people of that time. And with that qualification, she asserts the Dutch established some extremely tolerant policies.

In 1579, the Union of Utrecht is signed, the founding document of the Dutch Republic. It included a promise of religious freedom: that a person is free in his religion and shall not be “investigated or persecuted” due to their religion. (p. 345)

Now McCloskey does note they may not have completely lived up to this ideal, but at least they were holding up this high level of tolerance as a goal.

They did struggle to treat the Jewish people equally, so they decided to leave their treatment up to each city. However, by 1657, the Dutch Jews “became actual, full-rights subjects of the Republic.” (p. 346)

McCloskey notes one location that implemented toleration before the Dutch, Hungarian Transylvania based on the idea that “faith is a gift from God.” (p 346) McCloskey notes this is because their nobility had a variety of faiths.

France also made an attempt at toleration in 1598 with the Edict of Nantes, not long after the Dutch Republic was founded. It put an end to the fighting between the Protestants and Catholics.

However, it was short-lived. By 1685, the Edict was revoked and toleration of the Protestants ended. (p. 346)

One last spot of tolerance McCloskey mentions for that time period is Poland. They were influenced by Erasmus just like the Dutch, as explained the last chapter.

What Really Motivated the Bourgeois Dutch to Charity

While Poland declared religious liberty in 1573, by 1611 a new King insisted on Catholicism dominating, which became official policy by 1632. (p. 347)

Religious tolerance in the Netherlands, however, held on. But again, in a relative sense.

I didn’t say that the Netherlands in 1620 was as tolerant as it is now. I said it was more tolerant than other places in Europe at the time. The first large bourgeois society was virtuous by the standard of an intolerant Europe. (p. 355)

Conclusion

How did we get to the libertine Amsterdam that comes to mind for many people if Holland is mentioned today?

McCloskey says they are surprised themselves. While religious tolerance was established early on, the reality is much of their society was conformed to the Dutch Reformed Church until the 1960s. (p. 348)

…the post-1960s anticlerical movement was more successful in the Netherlands than anywhere else. The transformation from a churchgoing, respectable society circa 1960, divided into “pillars” by religious groups and stratified by class, to the present-day freewheeling Holland has been astounding, not least to the Dutch themselves. (p. 349)

They assert that they are not really so tolerant, to which McCloskey notes, they are not making the correct comparison.

…now as in the seventeenth century, …the Dutch perhaps don’t grasp how really lacking in toleration the competition is. (p. 349)

Wrapping up this history lesson, she refutes the idea that the Dutch adopted this relatively more tolerant viewpoint for prudence alone. However, as discussed in an earlier chapter, historical events did lead to the rise of the bourgeois in Holland and thus reasons to be prudent.

How the Dutch First Got Bougie

But McCloskey’s argument all along is it was not just prudence that motivated them. That is a bias being projected onto them by our time which has largely devolved into thinking all are motivated by self-interest.

People are partly motivated by prudence, to be sure. But that does not imply — though many young, male economists think it does — that all human motivation must therefore by reduced to freakonomics prudence, and that a claim of motivation from temperance, justice, courage, faith, hope, and love, and their sinful opposites, is mere womanly chatter. (p. 352)

Reference: McCloskey, Deirdre Nansen, 2016. “For Instance, Holland was Tolerant, and not for Prudence Only,” Chapter 37 of Bourgeois Equality, The University of Chicago Press.

Bourgeois Equality Bourgeois DealChristianityCultureEconomic HistoryVirtue Ethics

Post navigation

Previous post
Next post

Related Posts

Bourgeois Equality

Note to the Left: You are Wrong about Economic Growth

September 11, 2021July 24, 2025

A Discussion of Chapter 7 “Despite Doubts from the Left” Economic growth is the result of the Bourgeois Deal that allowed us to escape subsistence living, and yet the Left eyes growth with suspicion, concerns, criticism, and policies that would slow or stop it. In this chapter, McCloskey turns her…

Read More
Bourgeois Equality

Most of All, Profit Seeking is Even Good for the Poor

November 5, 2022July 26, 2025

A Discussion of Bourgeois Equality Chapter 61 “And Therefore Bourgeois Rhetoric Was Better for the Poor” As Dr. McCloskey is wrapping up Part IX of her book addressing how both history and economics have been misunderstood, she is arguing against the notion that the worker are living under a “false…

Read More
Bourgeois Equality

Adam Smith Wanted You Free to Make Your Own Decisions

January 15, 2022July 24, 2025

A Discussion of Bourgeois Equality Chapter 22 “And He Formulated the Bourgeois Deal” In this fourth and final chapter exploring Adam Smith’s impact, Dr. McCloskey explores his intellectual contribution toward a cultural shift to a favorable view of the rising bourgeois class. In the past three chapters, she has been…

Read More
  • 1913
  • Bourgeois Equality
  • Economic Thought
  • Macroeconomics
  • Microeconomics
  • Pedagogy
  • Regenerative Agriculture
  • Why We Bite the Invisible Hand
©2025 ECONGALLERY | WordPress Theme by SuperbThemes